Wednesday, June 19, 2019

Philosophical and Sociological aspects of crime and punishment Term Paper

Philosophical and Sociological aspects of crime and penalty - Term Paper Examplegy on crime argues that neither a state nor a hostelry is able to exist without regulations as he states, without law there lacks a state or a confederacy. In this case, the law forms an imperative foundation to a society and thus enforcing a law means the protection of the society. Any individual who violates the law tends to lose the right of being a member of the society and is against social order, and as are result must be punished (Murphy, 1994).The philosophical reflection on punishment assists criminologists, sociologists, and penologist to acknowledge the rehabilitative effects of programs overabundant in prisons. Kant offers invaluable knowledge in relation to the realm of punishment and crime. According to the proponent, punishment is validated if the criminal has committed a crime. Many theories telephone line this argument, for instance, and the Utilitarian approach demonstrates that puni shment is vindicated by the good it brings to the community. In Kants view, the utilitarian possibility is implausible in various ways. He believes that the theory treats offenders as means to the good of others and that the theory might punish innocent lives due to the good it passes to the society. To Kant, this is a sort of injustice, and in reference to his argument, he states how practically the offenders should be punished. The offense committed by the offender should equal the punishment given to the criminal (Murphy, 1994).Kants retributive theory associated with punishment asserts that retribution is not justified by any good outcome, but by the offenders guilt. Offenders must pay for their criminal activities otherwise unfairness as occurred. Consequently, the punishment given to the offender must fit the crime committed and thus the punishment for taking the life of another individual is equivalent to the death of the receiver (Ripstein, 2009). Therefore, punishment must be administered at all times because an individual has committed a crime.According to Kant

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.